The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that subjects carrying the ERCC1 rs11615 TT (OR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.36-3.41), ERCC2 rs1799793 AA (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.14-3.11), and ERCC6 rs2228528 AA genotypes (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.13-2.83) exhibited significantly increased risks of developing endometriosis compared with their counterparts carrying the wild-type genotypes.
In the screening cohort, 6 candidate SNPs were associated with the tendency to develop MDS: rs4135113 (TDG, p = 0.03), rs12917 (MGMT, p = 0.003), rs2230641 (CCNH, p = 0.01), rs2228529 and rs2228526 (ERCC6, p = 0.04 and p = 0.03), and rs1799977 (MLH1, p = 0.04).
In the screening cohort, 6 candidate SNPs were associated with the tendency to develop MDS: rs4135113 (TDG, p = 0.03), rs12917 (MGMT, p = 0.003), rs2230641 (CCNH, p = 0.01), rs2228529 and rs2228526 (ERCC6, p = 0.04 and p = 0.03), and rs1799977 (MLH1, p = 0.04).
We found that the G allele of rs2228527 and the G allele of rs2228529 within <i>NER</i> gene, interaction between rs2228529 and current smoking were all associated with increased NMSC risk.
We found that the G allele of rs2228527 and the G allele of rs2228529 within <i>NER</i> gene, interaction between rs2228529 and current smoking were all associated with increased NMSC risk.
Regarding the Met1097Val polymorphism, no significant association with bladder cancer risk was found in any of the genetic models evaluated (Val vs. Met: OR = 1.10, 95% CI, 0.97-1.25; Val/Val vs. Met/Met: OR = 1.23, 95% CI, 0.86-1.75; Val/Val + Val/Met vs. Met/Met: OR = 1.12, 95% CI, 0.96-1.30; Val/Val vs. Met/Met + Val/Met: OR = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.57-1.14).
Regarding the Met1097Val polymorphism, no significant association with bladder cancer risk was found in any of the genetic models evaluated (Val vs. Met: OR = 1.10, 95% CI, 0.97-1.25; Val/Val vs. Met/Met: OR = 1.23, 95% CI, 0.86-1.75; Val/Val + Val/Met vs. Met/Met: OR = 1.12, 95% CI, 0.96-1.30; Val/Val vs. Met/Met + Val/Met: OR = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.57-1.14).
Regarding the Met1097Val polymorphism, no significant association with bladder cancer risk was found in any of the genetic models evaluated (Val vs. Met: OR = 1.10, 95% CI, 0.97-1.25; Val/Val vs. Met/Met: OR = 1.23, 95% CI, 0.86-1.75; Val/Val + Val/Met vs. Met/Met: OR = 1.12, 95% CI, 0.96-1.30; Val/Val vs. Met/Met + Val/Met: OR = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.57-1.14).